May 13, 2011 > Hedge fund founder convicted in inside-trade case
Hedge fund founder convicted in inside-trade case
By Tom Hays and Larry Neumeister, Associated Press
NEW YORK (AP), May 11 - A former Wall Street titan was convicted Wednesday of making a fortune by coaxing a crew of corporate tipsters into giving him an illegal edge on blockbuster trades in technology and other stocks - what prosecutors called the largest insider trading case ever involving hedge funds.
Sri Lanka-born Raj Rajaratnam was convicted of five conspiracy counts and nine securities fraud charges at the closely watched trial in federal court in Manhattan. The jury had deliberated since April 25, and at one point was forced to start over again when one juror dropped out due to illness.
Prosecutors had alleged the 53-year-old Rajaratnam made profits and avoided losses totaling more than $60 million from illegal tips. His Galleon Group funds, they said, became a multibillion-dollar success at the expense of ordinary stock investors who didn't have advance notice of the earnings of public companies and of mergers and acquisitions.
On Wednesday, Rajaratnam sat at the defense table, a rarity for him at the trial, and stayed motionless as the verdict was read. He will remain free on bail, though now with electronic monitoring, at least until his July 29 sentencing.
Prosecutors said Rajaratnam faces a maximum term of more than 19 years in prison.
U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said the verdict sends a message that white collar laws apply to everyone, ``no matter how much money you have.''
The defendant ``was among the best and the brightest, one of the most educated, successful and privileged professionals in the country,'' Bharara said in a statement. ``Yet, like so many others, he let greed and corruption cause his undoing.''
Outside court, with Rajaratnam at his side, defense attorney John Dowd said there will be an appeal filed with the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Of the 37 trades that the government sought to prosecute, he added, only 14 made it to trial.
``The score is 23-14, in favor of the defense,'' he said. ``We'll see you in the 2nd Circuit.''
The verdict came after seven weeks of testimony showcasing wiretaps of Rajaratnam wheeling and dealing behind the scenes with corrupt executives and consultants. Some of the people on the other end of the line pleaded guilty and agreed to take the witness stand against him.
Authorities said the 45 tapes used in the case represented the most extensive use to date of wiretaps - common in organized crimes and drug cases - in a white-collar case.
The defense had fought hard in pretrial hearings to keep the avalanche of audio evidence out of the trial by arguing the FBI obtained it with a faulty warrant. Once a judge allowed them in, prosecutors put the recordings to maximum use by repeatedly playing them for jurors.
``You heard the defendant commit his crimes time and time again in his own words,'' Assistant U.S. Attorney Reed Brodsky said in closing arguments.
``The tapes show he didn't believe the rules applied to him,'' the prosecutor added. ``Cheating became part of his business model.''
The wiretaps appeared to play prominently in the jurors' deliberations: They asked to return to the courtroom countless times so they could listen to them again.
U.S. District Judge Richard Holwell told jurors not to talk about the deliberations.
After they were dismissed, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Streeter immediately asked the judge to jail Rajaratnam, arguing that his overseas bank accounts and properties gave him the means to flee the country. The prospect of a lengthy prison term also gave him ``tremendous incentive'' to go underground, Streeter said.
But the judge ruled that Rajaratnam could remain free on $100 million bail as long as he was placed under house arrest at his Manhattan home. When the courtroom emptied, the defendant paced around and looked somber as he waited to meet with his lawyers.
The defense had argued that the tapes revealed nothing more than that Rajaratnam was doing his duty by asking questions about information already circulating in the ``real world'' of high finance.
``That happens every day on Wall Street,'' Dowd told the jury. ``There's nothing wrong with it.''
Dowd headed a team of attorneys who crowded around the defense table each day. The defendant took an uncustomary position on a bench behind them and listened along with jurors as his voice filled the courtroom.
In one July 29, 2008, call, Rajaratnam could be heard grilling former Goldman Sachs board member Rajat Gupta about whether the board had discussed acquiring a commercial bank or an insurance company.
``Have you heard anything along that line?'' Rajaratnam asked Gupta.
``Yeah,'' Gupta responded. ``This was a big discussion at the board meeting.''
Prosecutors sought to maximize the impact of the Gupta tape by calling Goldman Sach's chairman Lloyd Blankfein to testify that the phone call violated the investment bank's confidentiality policies. Gupta, who has not been charged, has denied any wrongdoing.
The government also has played tapes of Rajaratnam it said proved he was trading secrets and orchestrating cover-ups with fellow hedge fund manager Danielle Chiesi, who has pleaded guilty in the case.
``I mean I think this stock could go up $10 you know? But we got to keep this radio silence,'' Rajaratnam said in one tape.
``Oh please. That is my pleasure,'' Chiesi responded.
``Not even to your little boyfriends, you know?''
``No, believe me, I don't have friends,'' she replied.
Rajaratnam advised Chiesi to buy 1 million shares of tech stock on an inside tip, then sell 500,000 of those shares - a tactic prosecutors say was used to throw regulators off the trail. In another instance, about 30 minutes of calls with an Intel tipster scored Rajaratnam a $2 million windfall on the computer chip-maker's stock, prosecutors said.
Former financial consultant Anil Kumar testified that he and Rajaratnam - his former classmate at the University of Pennsylvania's prestigious Wharton School - broke the law by speaking regularly about the negotiations over the acquisition of ATI Technologies Inc. by Kumar's client, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., before the deal was announced.
``I told him that this was `red hot' and shouldn't be discussed,'' Kumar said. Later, he said he cautioned the defendant, ``This is going to be a complete shock to the industry ... so treat this with the strictest of confidence.''
Prosecutors say Rajaratnam raked in $20 million by trading on his advance notice of the ATI-AMD deal. Afterward, he called Kumar at home and said, ``You're a star,'' Kumar told the jury in federal court in Manhattan.
When Rajaratnam later informed Kumar that he would be rewarded with a $1 million kickback, ``I almost fell off my chair,'' the witness said.
The Galleon probe has resulted in more than two dozen arrests and 21 guilty pleas. It also has led to a second investigation aimed at consultants in the securities industry who pass off inside information as the product of legitimate research.
Only Rajaratnam has gone to trial and relived conversations that the insiders never suspected were being monitored. On one tape, Rajaratnam sounded sheepish when one particularly effusive tipster praised him for being a star in the hedge fund universe.
``The myth,'' Rajaratnam said, ``is larger than the reality.''